Plato Essay

This essay attempts to contradict platos conclusion that democracy is a sad mannikin of government. This is based on his premis that democracy is a sort of government in which citizens grant fundamental societal decisions. universe noneworthy philosopher, Plato, concludes that Democracy is a bad clay of government, however, I go forth attempt to contradict this based on the first hypothesize of his argument. Premiss 1 of Platos argument, supporting his conclusion, states that, democracy is a form of government in which fundamental societal decisions are gift by the mass of citizens, and I will attempt to disprove this statement in this essay. If I am successful in proving that democracy is not a form of government in which fundamental societal decisions are made by the bulk of citizens, hence this will render Platos conclusion false; that human race that democracy is a bad form of government. In an holy person democracy, every last(predicate) societal dec isions should cook up the wishes of the majority, however this is gener eachy not the case. at that place is one societal decision that is guaranteed to represent the wishes of the majority, and that is the election of a leader. Once the majority has made this resole societal decision, it is then up to the leader to addle all subsequent decisions, whether or not the majority approve.

This isnt necessarily a bad matter because as Platos second premiss states, the majority of citizens are not qualified to make fundamental societal decisions. So, essentially, in a democracy, the majority elects someone who is q ualified to make these decisions, because th! ey are not competent enough to do so themselves. An example of this would be decisions related to the economic state of a society. If the majority were to make decisions on this matter, society would seize to bit in its dominion state. If you want to get a generous essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper