One Common Language Essay

According to an eleventh century Arab writer, Ibn-e-Hazm, in the beginning there existed a individual language given by God, thanks to which Adam was able to understand the quiddity of things. Over the checker history of homosexualkind, the fragmentation of this unique applauder that existed abinitio gave rise to a mass of diverse languages. An integration of all these, or a reversion to a exclusive language would have several repercussions. The fundamental benefits of a single world language atomic number 18 pragmatic. A third estate language would crash all communication barriers and increase mutual understanding amongst masses and the world over. Such an environment would be conducive to world intermission and the end of conflicts. Economic prosperity would be facilitated as business partners are able to communicate freely, leading to a growth of international trade. Xenophobia and some other related human fears would be eliminated as people are coupled under one lan guage.This would undermine at least some racial discrimination or ethno-centrism as societies become more egalitarian in their brain on foreign individuals. On the cultural front, a unique tongue would make redundant the need to translate works of literature or to subtitle/dub movies. The dissemination of knowledge and information could be through with(p) freely and in all parts of the globe, as the worlds comprehension of different cultures rises. However, there are some drawbacks of a single world language. The convenience of a single language with its resulting blandness would non make for a full life. Language is more than just a communication of needs, it is a reflection of the social, historical and cultural milieu of clubhouse and is therefore a sacred institution. By restricting the modes of human reflectivity to a single language we would be stultifying, repressing and suffocating mans desire to be creative. The limits of my language are the limits of my world, as som eone once aptly noted.Also, in a manner analogous to the situation depicted in George Orwells Nineteen Eighty-four, a single language is a dangerous situation as it whitethorn put disproportionate power into the few hands controlling the medium. Although the writ of execution of a single language is an achievable target, the situation is bound to be transient and impossible to maintain in the long run. Cultural differences between societies transcend language. This is proven by the distinct cultures of the countries speaking the same language.Hence, although the same language, face, as spoken in Canada for instance, is dissimilar to that spoken in the coupled Kingdom, the United States of Australia. Also, the culture of a country may be compose of several sub-cultures each with its own language. The home of the Queens English the UK is where English, Gaelic, Welsh, Punjabi, Bengali and Urdu, all coexist. Another obstacle in achieving this target of common language is politic al pride, which could create conflict between nations, when the choice of a dominant language is being made. In the light of the above discussion, I would suggest that if we are to succeed economically, socially, culturally and politically, then the world must(prenominal) embrace plurilinguism. The future is a multi-lingual one.