Democracy of U.S. History Essay

Democracy, as it is engaged today, means the plenty rule. A democracy is a form of political science ruled by the people of the country by dint of elections and representation. A democracy is really a form of republic cognise as a democratic republic. A republic is a g overnment where officials elected by a small aggroup of people that educate the essential decisions. Democracy has been around for almost 2500 years since Athens, Greece became the first democracy. The Romans withal experimented with democracy, however it was more a republic, and non a democracy. Around 1200 England put the groundwork to bewilder a republic. Later, in the 1700s, United States of America became a democracy. During the first decades of our premature earths existence, it is hard to imagine that the United States would evolve to become such a great democracy.A democracy others would prefer to debate with hypocrite reasoning. When the U.S. first won its independence it was a united group of people left to defend for themselves. This group was to become a nation and creating it involved more than winning independence from Great Britain. In 1783, the U.S. was a country forming in its premature stages. By 1787, this baby begins to develop, to become a nation. By 1787, people perceived that their constitution represented what the people desired the U.S. to be well at least the Federalists presumed this. The Anti-Federalists watched for signs that threatened their republican principals for which they so recently had fought the American Revolution. After winning the war the unity and optimism among Americans did not translate easily or smoothly into the creation of a wet rally government.The Federalists and Anti-Feds were very opposed to each others views. By the late 1700s and early 1800s, a deep political percentage had occurred amongst the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were mostly from the South, and were labeled Jeffersonian. Their label came from the situation that they defended slavery and third President, doubting Thomas Jefferson, was known for owning herds of black slaves. Southerners held agreed with many of Jeffersons views. The Anti-Feds and Republicans believed in unmitigated interpretation of the constitution, peaceful foreign relations, and a reduction of the role of the federal official government in the lives of average citizens. They were opposed to astrong central government and felt states should hold the power to govern. The Federalists believed that the constitution should be slackly interpreted and that America should follow the spirit of it to make laws and judgments.Federalists wanted to rise the states so a strong federal power could govern over them in order to keep enough power for the economy, war and ruling. some(prenominal) were opposed to this form of government because it so closely mimicked that of Great Britain. in the midst of these two diverse groups, their followers bump the nati on. The United States was geographically split North from South. The North was home of manufacturers and industry. Farming was not the Norths economic base as was manufacturing. Crops would not grow year around due to freezing weather wherefore slaves were of no need during off-seasons in farming. Here, it was not economically safe or resourceful to own slaves, because of the fact that they were expensive to acquire and maintain. Since slaves were mostly used in manual labor, their use in the North was almost nonexistent.Blacks were not used in factories for upkeep of them gaining knowledge and accessing power. In the South, large plantations and small farm owners used slaves for their manual labor of the fields and common house work. Not every household in the South owned a slave, as many people may believe. Only the wealthy could afford slaves. These slaves abducted from Africa were characterized and treated equivalent to animals by their owners. Since slaves were owned, they were property, and they were treated however their holders felt fit. This was a great threat to democracy because it went against what democracy supposedly stood for. Slavery, at the time, was disregarded in the constitution and therefore it can be concluded that the government ignored it.There were great threats to democracy during the first decades of U.S. independence that are far more important to the significance of the period. Americans held an optimistic view of the nations manifest destiny. The benefits and pitfalls that go hand-in-hand with a democratic society call for a fluid and corrigible constitution. Nevertheless, the strengths outweigh the weaknesses as evidenced by the overall equitable conditions amidst the citizens, and the relate opportunities available to all.