Critique of Thank You for Smoking? Essay -- Critiques

Critique of thank You for Smoking? Thank You for Smoking? is an article written by Peter Brimelow about the benefits of heater. Brimelow provides few very clear points which are well addressed. Even though I do not agree with the subject that bullet, in a way, is wide for you, (141) I think Peter Brimelow did a thorough job of qualification his opinions credible to the reader. Major Claim and GroundsThis essay is a near(a) example of a deductive essay beca office it moves from generalizations to specific instances (McFadden, 2003). It does this by stating the study withdraw that smoking, in some small ways, can be candid for people. The major claim is a statement of fact, judgment, or policy (McFadden, 2003). It is what the reference is trying to make the reader think. In the article, Thank You for Smoking, Brimelow attempts to prove that smoking may help the body counteract the effects of numerous diseases, including Parkinsons and Alzheimers. This list of examples of diseases is known as the grounds. The grounds in a stem consist of evidence, facts, and logic intaked to support the claim (McFadden, 2003). The major claim is well supported by the grounds and makes Brimelows arguments sound believable. Brimelows evidence shows smoking may be beneficial through the use of percentages. These percentages show the amount of people who are helped with common diseases by smoking. The use of these grounds gives Brimelows arguments believability through factual information.Re only iftal and qualifierBrimelow does a complete job of keeping the reader interested by refuting his own statements. He quotes the Surgeon Generals warning that smoking is dangerous to a persons health (p. 141). The preceding article of faith is ... ...phs (143). By attacking a person or group, Brimelow is swaying from the issue and draw the reader away from what they should be thinking about which is smoking, not lawyers. In this article, attack was not successful . This is the only part of the article where Brimelow lost credibility because he swayed from his issue. ConclusionThe conclusion to Brimelows article is smoking does fool benefits. His article has not swayed me to go buy a pack of Camels, but it has opened my eyes to the fact that there could be some benefits to smoking. Overall, Brimelows claims and evidence were strong and I gained more insight on the affair of smoking. ReferencesMcFadden, J. (2003). Title of PPT. Buena Vista University. Storm Lake, IA.Wallace, V. (1998). Give Children the Vote. The Genre of Argument. Ed. Irene L. Clark. Boston Thomson/Heinle. Pages.