Social Inequality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Social Inequality - Essay ExampleOf the triple Webers stratification theory appears to be the most accurate prediction while Marxs gradation theory could non prove itself in modern fiat. Durkheims functionalist theory also had predicted somewhat similar characteristics and problems that exist in our society today. .Marx visualized that the historical change would be identical to the changes in relation to class conflicts. He overemphasized the fact that there will be no progress if there argon no class conflicts. payable to the industrial revolution, all favorable order, i.e., master craftsmen, journeymen, and apprentices were abolished. Marx argues that class clamber between oppressing and oppressed classes is essential for a modern favorable change. Apparently he could not devote much time to analyze and run the life of the middle class (the class between bourgeoisie and proletariat) and said that they are small set about of the ruling class but later join proletariat, the revolutionary class. That appears to be contrary to the existing social dimensions, where the middle class has become one of the dominant one.Over the years many of Marxs predictions were proved wrong, for case class polarization, instead of conflicts between two main classes like what Marx argued, today our society doesnt appear to be a complex one with the emergence of middle class population in the absence of class conflicts. Another failed prediction of Marxs prediction was concentration of capital. Capital is not confined to capitalists only, but with growing poetry of ambitious smaller to medium sized entrepreneurs, the property ownership has spread to different segments of the society. Anyone having some showtime money can invest it in their own business. Webers stratification theory, on the other hand, presents multidimensional causes of social inequality in relation to several conflicting groups. He argues that there are various secernate social group in society bas ed on class, status and party. And these different groups create a kind of social inequality. Class is determined by economic order whereas status is determined by styles of life. The party consisted of people cast political power. Like Marx, Weber also recognizes the significance of class struggle that is related to market exchange. Therefore, class does not comprise of just one group but more or less consisted of various kinds of economic class. According to Weber, the economic classes tend to be confined to four different social classes in capitalist society. There are propertied classes, property-less non manual(a) class, petty bourgeoisie and manual running(a) class. As compared to Marxs class theory there are two middle classes in Webers kind of society. The property-less non manual class and the petty bourgeoisie form the middle class in Webers theory. Petty bourgeoisie are people who own their own production such as small manufacture, business, or farm. The non manual w orking class i.e, the so called white-collar doer, are people who had education and trained to become professional worker receiving wages in return of their work. The status groups consisted of people who have social honor or authority. They have a tendency to distinguish themselves from outside of their status groups. Lastly party is designed to achieve common action. Webers stratification theory represents todays social inequality by introducing various stratified